Idaho State U: Show us the Bigfoot blimp

NOTE: This post has several updates, the latest being on 2-17.

On Jan. 25, 2015, the Idaho State Journal published an article

http://www.idahostatejournal.com/members/falcon-project-hopes-to-find-bigfoot-with-unmanned-airship/article_9123b55e-a47f-11e4-bc8b-5746d2cac692.html

on a strange project which seems to be funded through Idaho State University. Prof. Jeff Meldrum seems to have been the sole source for the article, which says he was recruited as a scientific advisor (a 2013 press release names Dr. Meldrum as Principal Investigator). The project, with a projected budget of some $250,000, aims to collect evidence for the existence of an unclassified and dubious wild primate known as “Bigfoot”, using a variety of state of the art surveillance equipment supposedly carried by a strange two-chambered blimp, an artist’s version of which is shown.
The meat of the article appears to be this:

“The Aurora is a 35-foot dual-cell catamaran-style airship. Meldrum said it can stay airborne for about 10 hours and carry a 75-pound payload consisting of cutting-edge thermal imaging cameras and high definition videography equipment. The professor said the airship will be operated and monitored by a knowledgeable ground crew. Thermal imaging is needed, Meldrum said, because the Bigfoot creature is considered to be nocturnal.
The Aurora is the invention of Stephen Barclay, an aeronautical engineer and owner of Remote Aerial Tripod Systems, or RATS Inc. in Alberta, Canada.”

In 2014 Dr. Meldrum announced funding: “William has met with a benefactor who has committed a quarter million dollars worth of airships (3) and much supporting equipment to the effort.”

The project has now recruited a number of men to leave their homes to act as volunteer labor for six months. The identities have been published on the project website.

Apparently the State Journal did not find the idea of a catamaran blimp (and the other claims) to be sufficiently odd to prompt any sort of fact checking. Surely the idea of a catamaran blimp (has anyone ever seen one?) should have been enough to raise a red flag. In any event, a simple search showed the RATS’s web site is dead. A further search yielded the information that RATS is supposedly located in the small town of Lac le Biche, Alberta, had only two employees,( apparently Stephen Barclay is the boss)and showed a phone number which is not in service. Phone calls to the Chamber of Commerce and various businesses there found no evidence that this company is operating nor could I locate Barclay. Some old blog posts by Barkley led to two firms who had previously done business with RATS; neither had a working number for them.

In our opinion, this is hardly the presence one would expect from the firm that is supposedly building a radical aeronautical design for delivery this summer.

The State Journal article mentions William Barnes as the instigator of the project.

The project website gives some info on Mr. Barnes

http://the-falconproject.com/main_site/

and additional undocumented claims about the purported blimp technology. Mr. Barnes’ “resume” gives no educational or formal employment data. He has apparently been seeking gold for a number of years. Seriously.

The claim is made at their Facebook page that the project received FAA approval for Mr. Barnes or someone to fly this unproven craft, supposedly at 4000 feet. Mr. Barnes has stated that his affiliation with Idaho State (thus becoming “not for profit” or a governmental operation?) enabled him to obtain this blanket permission to fly an unmanned craft wherever Mr. Barnes wishes. We aren’t experts, but, frankly, don’t believe this, and let’s just say we aren’t alone in this opinion. We suggest somebody better check on this aspect as well. Here’s what we found, at the FAA:

COAs
For public aircraft operations, the FAA issues a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) that permits public agencies and organizations to operate a particular aircraft, for a particular purpose, in a particular area. The COA allows an operator to use a defined block of airspace and includes special safety provisions unique to the proposed operation. COAs usually are issued for a specific period – up to two years in many cases.
The FAA works with these organizations to develop conditions and limitations for UAS operations to ensure they do not jeopardize the safety of other aviation operations. The objective is to issue a COA with parameters that ensure a level of safety equivalent to manned aircraft. Usually, this entails making sure that the UAS does not operate in a populated area and that the aircraft is observed, either by someone in a manned aircraft or someone on the ground to ensure separation from other aircraft in accordance with right-of-way rules. Common public uses today include law enforcement, firefighting, border patrol, disaster relief, search and rescue, military training, and other government operational missions.”

Now, since the blimp isn’t built, and neither the area of operation nor the dates are known (as Barnes admitted in a recent interview linked in the update to this post) and the operation doesn’t fit the typical uses listed we don’t see how William Barnes could possibly have advance FAA approval.

Lastly, these imaging systems cannot “see” through the canopy of the deep forest where the Bigfoot believers would have us believe these great apes live and hide.

In sum, this project seems to have large credibility gaps (even without consideration of the existence of Bigfoot). Where is this improbable blimp coming from? Is it even a workable design? Is someone being paid? “Cui bono?” Has ISU participated in recruiting these volunteers to give 6 months of their lives for a project to find a non-existent animal using a non-existent blimp from a non-existent company under non-existent permission from the FAA or the Department of the Interior?Is ISU comfortable with the Human Resources issues? How are these volunteers going to be fed and housed and kept from harm? Has the Idaho State University institutional research review board really approved this? According to William Barnes, it was approved in only five days!

We would be happy to post reassuring (and verifiable) information on the Falcon Project. Perhaps ISU thinks that Mr. Barnes is an independent contractor, so these are his problems, not ISU’s. We are not lawyers, so we can’t speak to that. What we can say is that Dr. Meldrum has been front and center telling donors a number of claims that look pretty shaky to us.

Update:
Dr. Meldrum seems to have learned that his blimp-pie in the sky project is under scrutiny. On his Facebook page (Don Jeffrey Meldrum) he seems to make subtle but noticeable retreat from his prior enthusiasm (while not providing any real info on the bizarre blimp or its maker and still soliciting contributions, however). Shortly after that post, he closes the FB page to further comments, citing an apparently coincidental(?) time crunch!!

Let’s hope the poor volunteers haven’t already given their employers notice or sublet their apartments.

Update 2/15: according to a recent interview posted January 20, 2015, project manager William Allen Barnes rambles on for over an hour, making all sorts of claims that are noticeably short on details and verification. He did, however, give these details: he has hired his volunteers without background checks, and he also states that they will all carry sidearms.
Yikes!
So besides showing us the blimp, ISU, let’s see your liability coverage….

And what are the odds that this unexamined collection of a dozen or more gun-toting volunteers are ever going to get permission to occupy/live on public land for six months, and surveil, harass or even worse, any “creature” that walks on two legs i.e. human beings?

Update 2/17:
In an interview on 2/16, William Barnes said (paraphrased):
He has no permits from the Department of the Interior, which would include all national forests, BLM and national parks!!!
@25 minutes into the interview: “Even if we get run off out of the United States by the Department of Interior — which has the final say on anything I do — I’ll just go to Canada.”
[!!! So it appears he has no ground to search….]
[back to the interview]
He has a close friendship with the builder of the craft, which is a one of a kind, custom made, military grade surveillance craft using a propulsion system that is effective and quiet and allows great maneuverability, and range. While the craft is to be restricted to a 10 mile radius it has a 20 mile capability.can reach heights over 10,000 feet above see level and speeds up to 45 miles per hour. The platform of the craft is 48 feet long. On board it is equipped with Thermal imaging, Inferred Night Vision, and HD filming, all observing through a very power full and large lense, fully motorized, and capable of facial recognition from a mile away. There is also Co2 recognition capabilities on board as well as redundancies in the camera chip to ensure no loss of signal, redundancies in the motor system and homing devices ensure it arrives back safely. The command and control center will feature “recognition software”that will allow them to quickly identify subjects. It is very fuel efficient and durable, even if shot in the air it will still fly and can be patched. The mission of the craft will be centered over areas where the forest floor is in view, not densely forested areas. It will be flying between mountains, but not during times of strong winds, primarily at night during the ground surveillance hours. To fly safely it will be shut down if winds are over 15 mph. Professional trackers will operate in the daylight locating sign of the creatures, and night surveillance will then be positioned. The teams will attempt to map out movements and determine the range of the creatures, and if possible capture film evidence in the process. Scat, hair, and any other form of retrievable DNA will be gathered under strict protocols. The FAA regulations for a research and education craft of it’s kind require them to obtain permits and submits flight plans, the craft is fitted with a transponder and operation lights that make it identifiable to other crafts. They will be obtaining a COA for a 500 mile area to give you an idea of the ground being covered.
The craft should be completed in the late summer and join the ground crews. The exact amount and cost of the project is not known at present, but funding is in place to get the crew out and the craft started…..

Our comment: Firstly, the claims about the non-existent blimp seem to get bigger with each telling. I would also draw attention to this
….. he has a close friendship with the builder of the craft…
And would add that this friend (who has yet to prove he is the builder) is citizen of a foreign country, for whatever that may mean in terms of accountability.

But, more importantly, Mr. Barnes makes a couple of important admissions here, most notably that he does not have an FAA authorization to use any airspace, nor permission to put his gun-toting Bigfoot zealots on any ground-space. And without the latter, how can he obtain the former???

In spite of all this, ISU is apparently sanctioning this project, and thereby allowing some 17 unpaid men to disrupt their lives for what is looking pretty half-baked.

Finally, we will add a description of Mr. Barnes’ interview given by a believer: “…he said he expected some flack for the Department of the Interior, and may even take the project
to B.C. if necessary. As far as Williams bio, he was a fundraiser for many organizations, did some prospecting, owned a business, and now is a full time researcher. I am sure he would be happy to fill you in if you called him, but be ready for a phone bill…he can talk with the best of them… and it is almost entirely interesting. I credit him with a bit of genius in that regard, just the right guy to dream this big…”

Of course, we could be wrong in our impressions of this project, and welcome any response or input from responsible parties at the school…so far we have gotten none.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Foxcatcher: film review

This film is dark and depressing, and seemingly without meaningful dialogue. The only sympathetic character is Dave Schultz (Mark Rufallo), but he is a minor part of the film, which builds to his death at the hands of zombie-like John E. duPont. The latter is played by Steve Carell as a spoiled rich insane zombie who had too much facial plastic surgery. Sienna Miller plays Dave’s attractive and intelligent wife but she has only like maybe four lines. Channing Tatum’s Mark Schultz is a completely uninteresting hulk who speaks in occasional grunts and assorted other monosyllables. Unlike Carell, he doesn’t appear to have had plastic surgery, but has about the same range of facial expression: zero. Vanessa Redgrave as Momma duPont seems to feel the same way about her screen son as I feel about the entire movie…”OMG”.
The film does not follow the historical facts terribly closely. The interesting issues of duPont’s trial are completely ignored; was he sane? why did he do it? who knows. And he died in prison. Of what? Who knows?
Somehow this film won some awards. WTF. I guess that is just because it portrays a rich industrialist as an asshole. I give this film a 3 out of 5 and that is generous. Given the fact that it has FIVE star actors, that is pretty bad. Save your money and have your local CIA agent put you in a stress position for two hours…you’ll duplicate the experience of watching Foxcatcher (minus the popcorn).

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Torrey Pines State Natural Reserve: South Beach and Reserve

Just north of La Jolla, this is a great (and busy) place to hike, and there is abundant literature online. Lots of people. No pets. Don’t expect to see any wildlife. I’d make a few points/recommendations:
1. Do not park at the entrance unless you have some desire to make a long uphill (and later, downhill) hazardous hike long the edge of a narrow road; better to drive up the hill on the entrance road and park in one of the lots up on the bluff; that lets you do your hiking along the trails rather than along the entrance road.
2. Use the map available on line and at trailheads.
3. supposedly drinks (and food) are forbidden. BS… carry a water bottle. They often sell them at the trailhead. Plus, food is permitted if you are hiking to the beach (which you could pretty much claim wherever you are ha ha).
4. We started at the trailhead near the Ranger Station; and headed for the West Overlook to get an idea of the terrain.
5. take the Razor Point Trail to the cliffs
6. walk across Big Basin and turn left to reach the Beach Trail
7. take the Beach trail to the right and go down to the beach. It’s small, but refreshing. Stay away from the cliffs when on the beach.
8. take your choice on the return: either retrace your steps up the Beach Trail toward your parking lot; or, if you have water and want a much longer and boring walk, take the Broken Hill Trail, which takes you up to the abandoned section of the road, where you turn left to get back to the parking areas.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Anton Corbijn’s “A Most Wanted Man” with Philip Seymour Hoffman and Robin Wright

I give this film a high recommendation.

Philip Seymour Hoffman died in February at age 46. This is his last completed film. He appears in a “truncated’ supporting role in Mockinjay to be released in the fall.  His best were The Big Lebowski, Capote, Master, Doubt, Charlie Wilson’s War….

“Wanted” is an enjoyable and suspenseful film. Hoffman’s performance was excellent, though  a bit of a “cut out” role, as so many of his have been. It’s as if his characters usually need to “get a life.”  And really, it looked as though he was afraid his face would break if he changed his expression even once during the entire film.*

English author John Le Carre’ (leh care ay) now 82, first novel was The Spy Who Came in from the Cold, while he was working for British spy agency MI6. He resigned to become a full time novelist. Most recent novel was the 2013 “A Delicate Truth”; most recent film adaptation: “Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy” with Gary Oldman , inspired by the Kim Philby affair.

Anton Corbijn’s (COR-bane) most recent prior film was “The American” with George Clooney.

A more comprehensive review can be found here. 

*might be an exaggeration; you tell me.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Restaurant review: Piperade, San Francisco

Piperade is a comfortable spot at 1015 Battery at Green, between Telegraph Hill and the Embarcadero in San Francisco. Supposedly Basque, but the cuisine is not  really dominated by that influence. The food is very good, price is not bad for the City, and the service is good. Thankfully, the noise level is generally low. Access is easy, good parking nearby, and there a number of interesting spots within easy walking distance.  From the south, follow 280 to King to the Embarcadero, turn left on Broadway and right on Front, to park.  Then walk two blocks. The restaurant is on the location of the American cannon battery of 1846, (hence the name Battery Street) placed there to defend the village of Yerba Buena against the Spanish in the period after California was “conquered” by the U.S.  The battery was given the name Fort Montgomery, though it was probably not much of a fort.

I had the fried manchego, duck comfit, and for dessert the orange blossom beignets…excellent.  Others at the table had the Piperade (sauteed peppers, onions and Serrano ham with poached egg).  This is definitely a place I’d go again.

Afterwards, you can walk a block west on Green to see the place where television was invented, at 200 Green, also the the site of the infamous Gray Brothers rock quarrying operation, that brought down a substantial part of Telegraph Hill before the nefarious owner was shot and killed by a disgruntled worker, much to the delight of San Franciscans, who acquitted him of any crime.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Book Review: The King’s Grave by Phillipa Langley and Michael Jones

NY: St. Martin’s Press, 2013.

This is the story of the discovery and exhumation of the remains of Richard III in the floor of a medieval monastery in Leicester, England.  Certainly an interesting read, the book is flawed by the apparent intention of the author (P.L.)to make it about whether Richard was a good person or not. As a result, much of the book is consumed in attempting to read scraps of history or archeology, or indeed anatomy, in a way that would be exculpatory for Richard’s alleged misdeeds, including the killing the two boys in the Tower of London in the summer of 1483. .  Much history is provided, interspersed between episodes of the modern search and discovery.  Who knew there was a Richard III Society, the goal of which is seemingly to cast the Tudors (the family that followed Richard’s on the throne) and Shakespeare (author of Henry VI and Richard III as the bad guys, who invented nasty stories about Richard?  Well, there is, and Langley founded the Scottish Branch.

The high point of the book should have been the uncovering of Richard’s distorted bones, his “crookback’ (scoliosis) that, for all intents, proved the remains were his; instead of being thrilled, Langley writes how disappointed she was that Richard was actually “deformed.” Her thesis was that the idea of a deformity had been invented, Richard was portrayed as being deformed in order to make him seem more evil.  She then proceeds to put up a bit of a strawman of “hunchback”, saying that Richard’s deformity wasn’t actually that bad. Medically speaking, she was making the distinction between scoliosis (a lateral bending of the spine) and kyphoscoliosis (lateral and front-to-back bending).  The former is characterized mainly by a visible difference between the height of the two shoulders, while the latter is manifest by an apparent “hump” in the upper back.  This question is well-discussed here.

In studying the early descriptions of Richard’s disability, however, it is telling to notice the words which are not applied to him. To our knowledge, Richard is not described as “bunch-backed” in print until Shakespeare; the word “boss” (from the French bossu) does not seem to have been used either. Both refer to a swelling or hump. Shakespeare’s Richard is called “crookback” three times in Henry VI, Part 3, and is more specific himself about his appearance when he claims that nature made “an envious mountain on my back, / Where sits deformity to mock my body” (Act 3, scene ii), and later describes his shoulder as “thick” (5.vii). Rather than deliberately inventing the hunchbacked Richard, though, Shakespeare may have interpreted the word “crookback” as referring to this kind of spinal deformity. The OED’s first recorded use of “hunch-backed” is the second quarto of Richard III (1598), 4.iv, when Queen Elizabeth calls him “that foule hunch-backt toade” (“bunch-backt” in the first quarto; Q2’s variation is retained in later quartos). In one sense at least, it is plausible that Shakespeare (or perhaps one of his printers) is the inventor of the hunch-backed Richard, and that this term stems either from a typesetting error or from a misreading. If so, it is indicative of how influential Shakespeare’s version of Richard’s body has been.

So the high point of the search becomes, for the author, a disappointment, instead of a victory. Sort of deflates the whole book.

I recommend the book, though of course with a large grain of salt.  The historical discussions are interesting, but it is difficult to know whether the prominent bias of Langley might have introduced serious distortions. I look forward to a more balanced discussion by other researchers in in the future.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

If Our Founding Fathers Were All Christians, Why Did They Say This?

link

“If I could conceive that the general government might ever be so administered as to render the liberty of conscience insecure, I beg you will be persuaded, that no one would be more zealous than myself to establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution.”

– George Washington, letter to the United Baptist Chamber of Virginia (1789)

“Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, then that of blindfolded fear.”

– Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr (1787)

and many more….

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized