read it. The Gore team decided to take a rather “forest” view instead of “trees;” that is consistent with Gore’s non-confrontational approach. I think they could have refuted in somewhat more detail. For example, the idea that polar bears drowned because of a storm. Well, they have storms there all the time; the issue was that the bears were too far from their ice, because the ice is melting, and couldn’t get back to safety.
but who am I?
UPDATE: for a rather complete discussion, see RealClimate.