Washington Post should either fire Howard Kurtz or change his job title

Howard Kurtz is supposed to be a “media critic” for the Washington Post.
Media Matters

On Glenn Beck, Howard Kurtz said that Keith Olbermann has described Fox News as a channel that “poses as a news organization and puts out dangerous misinformation [and] is a cheerleader for the Bush administration, that it is misinforming our society.” Kurtz added: “But you know what? They’re entitled to do that.

Perhaps the Post has a position entitled “Media Apologist.”

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Dick Cheney: Hannibal Lector in disguise?, George W. Bush: is he really THAT bad?, media, Politics

2 responses to “Washington Post should either fire Howard Kurtz or change his job title

  1. Just as you are entitled to slam him. 🙂

  2. Melisa:
    your idol (isn’t there something in the Bible about that) is responsible for a million dead Iraqis, while he plays you like a fool.

    His daughters would get an abortion (and probably have) in a heartbeat.

    Howard Kurtz plays you like a fool, as well. The issue is not about freedom of speech, which liberals and progressives advocate heartily, as opposed to your folk (I’m sure you oppose sex education, for example). The issue is whether Kurtz is providing “media criticism.”

    Have a nice day.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s