Steve Clemons reports Cheney may try to incite war with Iran

This is a strange sort of a thing. Steve Clemons is normally pretty reliable. I hesitate to interpret it.

Multiple sources have reported that a senior aide on Vice President Cheney’s national security team has been meeting with policy hands of the American Enterprise Institute, one other think tank, and more than one national security consulting house and explicitly stating that Vice President Cheney does not support President Bush’s tack towards Condoleezza Rice’s diplomatic efforts and fears that the President is taking diplomacy with Iran too seriously.

This White House official has stated to several Washington insiders that Cheney is planning to deploy an “end run strategy” around the President if he and his team lose the policy argument.

The thinking on Cheney’s team is to collude with Israel, nudging Israel at some key moment in the ongoing standoff between Iran’s nuclear activities and international frustration over this to mount a small-scale conventional strike against Natanz using cruise missiles (i.e., not ballistic missiles).

This strategy would sidestep controversies over bomber aircraft and overflight rights over other Middle East nations and could be expected to trigger a sufficient Iranian counter-strike against US forces in the Gulf — which just became significantly larger — as to compel Bush to forgo the diplomatic track that the administration realists are advocating and engage in another war.

There are many other components of the complex game plan that this Cheney official has been kicking around Washington. The official has offered this commentary to senior staff at AEI and in lunch and dinner gatherings which were to be considered strictly off-the-record, but there can be little doubt that the official actually hopes that hawkish conservatives and neoconservatives share this information and then rally to this point of view. This official is beating the brush and doing what Joshua Muravchik has previously suggested — which is to help establish the policy and political pathway to bombing Iran.

The zinger of this information is the admission by this Cheney aide that Cheney himself is frustrated with President Bush and believes, much like Richard Perle, that Bush is making a disastrous mistake by aligning himself with the policy course that Condoleezza Rice, Bob Gates, Michael Hayden and McConnell have sculpted.

According to this official, Cheney believes that Bush can not be counted on to make the “right decision” when it comes to dealing with Iran and thus Cheney believes that he must tie the President’s hands.

On Tuesday evening, i spoke with a former top national intelligence official in this Bush administration who told me that what I was investigating and planned to report on regarding Cheney and the commentary of his aide was “potentially criminal insubordination” against the President. I don’t believe that the White House would take official action against Cheney for this agenda-mongering around Washington — but I do believe that the White House must either shut Cheney and his team down and give them all garden view offices so that they can spend their days staring out their windows with not much to do or expect some to begin to think that Bush has no control over his Vice President.

It is not that Cheney wants to bomb Iran and Bush doesn’t, it is that Cheney is saying that Bush is making a mistake and thus needs to have the choices before him narrowed.

This is certainly compatible with the story that I posted early today on the “leak” that divulged that Bush has signed a special finding allowing for secret actions against Iran…one might suppose that the Cheney camp gave this story to ABC, and is trying to sabotage diplomatic relations between the US and Iran. However, if this scenario is correct, one would think that a normal president would object to Cheney’s disclosures…but there are no normal people in charge of this country.



Filed under Bill Kristol: is he smarter than you?, Dick Cheney: Hannibal Lector in disguise?, George W. Bush: is he really THAT bad?, Iran, Iraq, Politics

3 responses to “Steve Clemons reports Cheney may try to incite war with Iran

  1. pickinjim

    Well that’s a pretty long drawn out way to say that Steve doesn’t like Cheney. Got it, nice. I propose however that it’s Iran that will incite war with Iran. After all, there is a whole lot more “real evidence” to support that view than the Cheney theory I’m afraid. (eradicate Israel, no holocaust, David Duke dinner dates, Hugo Chavez, hostages, huge nuke program….must I go on?) Journalists, please.

  2. It is not the policy of Iran to eradicate Israel, nor does Iran hold that the Holocaust did not occur, though the latter would hardly be cause for war, would it? They support the Saudi peace plan for the Israel/Palestinian problem. David Duke is hardly worthy of a spitball. Hugo Chavez poses no threat to anyone, and most assuredly not to the US or Israel. The US holds more Iranian hostages than the reverse. The Iranians do not have a nuclear weapon, or is there any proof that they seek one; their policy is to not seek such a weapon. They have never invaded another country.

    You have been sadly fooled, my friend.

  3. Pingback: Condi references Dick Cheney as a "new crazy." Yipes. « Over the line, Smokey!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s